Thank you for writing this. I'm not a technical or math person, but I've got enough personal experience with these concepts to know that you're on to something.
What Id like to know is why aren't LLMs currently being developed in the way you've proposed here? Any ideas on that?
Thought-provoking framing here. The collision example with bank hits hard because its exactly the kind of thing people dunno theyre doing until a model goes sideways mid-conversation. The Bezos/Musk comparison is particularly clever - shared features creating silent drift is something I noticed in production but never had the vocabulary for. Making branch-switching expensive by design rather then patching it later feels like the right architectural move.
Great
Thank you for writing this. I'm not a technical or math person, but I've got enough personal experience with these concepts to know that you're on to something.
What Id like to know is why aren't LLMs currently being developed in the way you've proposed here? Any ideas on that?
Thought-provoking framing here. The collision example with bank hits hard because its exactly the kind of thing people dunno theyre doing until a model goes sideways mid-conversation. The Bezos/Musk comparison is particularly clever - shared features creating silent drift is something I noticed in production but never had the vocabulary for. Making branch-switching expensive by design rather then patching it later feels like the right architectural move.
Good content, but way too much AI writing style. It reads like '70s polyester feels.
ML cannot by itself give you AGI. It does not adapt.
Thanks again for sharing your work Jose, you are the best writer on AI I have found so far. You're helping me and changing how I think!